“Technology Use Planning Overview”
- The “Guidebook for Developing an Effective Instructional Technology Plan” defines technology planning as “an activity that provides direction and helps users understand clearly where they are now and imagine where they want to be.” I would absolutely agree with this definition and have had the opportunity to play an active role in technology planning.
At Wake Forest School of Medicine (WFSM), we have been highly engaged in technology planning over the past year, as we plan to move to a new campus and prepare for a LCME (Liaison Committee on Medical Education) accreditation visit in 2016. I have seen firsthand the importance of:
- Having all stakeholders at the table.
- Knowing the current needs and future direction of the curriculum.
- Understanding the LCME standards and how they apply to a learning management system (LMS) or use of technology embedded within the curriculum.
- The National Educational Technology Plan 2010 provides a blueprint for developing a technology plan. It also provides guidelines to educators about how to effectively and comprehensively cover all bases when developing a plan.
- While I do agree with See that technology use plans need to be short term (not long term plans) and like his idea of phases, I’m not sure that is practical in most work environments. Most technology is expensive to purchase and is most often a major line item in the budget. Just developing the plan costs schools staff and faculty effort, not to mention the time and cost incurred to implement. Therefore, while I agree that technology is a fast moving target and changes constantly, I cannot see it being practical to do major technology use planning annually.
- See comments that “effective technology plans focus on applications, not technology”, meaning that plans need to be output, rather than input based.
- I do agree with See that technology plans should focus on the output. It is important to know the goals of your curriculum or the logistics that support your curriculum before making decisions on technology.
- As I mentioned earlier, I have been involved with technology planning for about a year now. At WFSM, we were using a homegrown LMS system for all four years that worked for basic functions but it did not have the capability to map our curriculum (an LCME requirement). We have had to purchase two other systems to correct this issue (LCMS+ for preclinical education and Canvas for clinical education). While it could seem excessive, it was critical in order to meet the demands of LCME and the logistic and delivery needs of our curriculum. While some outcomes are good (being LCME compliant for example), we are currently in the painful period of implementation. It has difficult been to operate three different systems (we are still using our homegrown system for patient tracking (a different LCME standard)) and train staff and faculty on what the purpose of each system and how to use it effectively.

